No wonder so many people are single. A few years ago, I spoke to a group of high-schoolers about the Jewish idea of love.
On the uses of a liberal education: September 1, Harper's Magazine Mark Edmundson A college student getting a liberal arts education ponders filling out a questionnaire that includes an opportunity for him to evaluate his instructor.
At times it appears that the purpose of his education is just to entertain him. Today is evaluation day in my Freud class, and everything has changed.
The class meets twice a week, late in the afternoon, and the clientele, about fifty undergraduates, tends to drag in and slump, looking disconsolate and a little lost, waiting for a jump start.
To get the discussion moving, they usually require a joke, an anecdote, an off-the-wall question -- When you were a kid, were your Halloween getups ego costumes, id costumes, or superego costumes?
That sort of thing. But today, as soon as I flourish the forms, a buzz rises in the room. Today they write their assessments of the course, their assessments of me, and they are without a doubt wide-awake.
Whatever interpretive subtlety they've acquired during the term is now out the window. As I retreat through the door -- I never stay around for this phase of the ritual -- I look over my shoulder and see them toiling away like the devil's auditors.
They're pitched into high writing gear, even the ones who struggle to squeeze out their journal entries word by word, stoked on a procedure they have by now supremely mastered.
They're playing the informed consumer, letting the provider know where he's come through and where he's not quite up to snuff. But why am I so distressed, bolting like a refugee out of my own classroom, where I usually hold easy sway?
Chances are the evaluations will be much like what they've been in the past -- they'll be just fine.
It's likely that I'll be commended for being "interesting" and I am commended, many times overthat I'll be cited for my relaxed and tolerant ways that happens, toothat my sense of humor and capacity to connect the arcana of the subject matter with current culture will come in for some praise yup.
I've been hassled this term, finishing a manuscript, and so haven't given their journals the attention I should have, and for that I'm called -- quite civilly, though -- to account.
Overall, I get off pretty well. Yet I have to admit that I do not much like the image of myself that emerges from these forms, the image of knowledgeable, humorous detachment and bland tolerance. I do not like the forms themselves, with their number ratings, reminiscent of the sheets circulated after the TV pilot has just played to its sample audience in Burbank.
Most of all I dislike the attitude of calm consumer expertise that pervades the responses. I'm disturbed by the serene belief that my function -- and, more important, Freud's, or Shakespeare's, or Blake's -- is to divert, entertain, and interest.
Observes one respondent, not at all unrepresentative: I don't teach to amuse, to divert, or even, for that matter, to be merely interesting. When someone says she "enjoyed" the course -- and that word crops up again and again in my evaluations -- somewhere at the edge of my immediate complacency I feel encroaching self-dislike.
That is not at all what I had in mind. The off-the-wall questions and the sidebar jokes are meant as lead-ins to stronger stuff -- in the case of the Freud course, to a complexly tragic view of life.
But the affability and the one-liners often seem to be all that land with the students; their journals and evaluations leave me little doubt.
I want some of them to say that they've been changed by the course. I want them to measure themselves against what they've read. It's said that some time ago a Columbia University instructor used to issue a harsh two-part question. What book did you most dislike in the course? What intellectual or characterological flaws in you does that dislike point to?
The hand that framed that question was surely heavy. But at least it compels one to see intellectual work as a confrontation between two people, student and author, where the stakes matter. Why are my students describing the Oedipus complex and the death drive as being interesting and enjoyable to contemplate?
And why am I coming across as an urbane, mildly ironic, endlessly affable guide to this intellectual territory, operating without intensity, generous, funny, and loose? Because that's what works.
On evaluation day, I reap the rewards of my partial compliance with the culture of my students and, too, with the culture of the university as it now operates.
It's a culture that's gotten little exploration. Current critics tend to think that liberal-arts education is in crisis because universities have been invaded by professors with peculiar ideas: They believe that genius and tradition are out and that P.
But mulling over my evaluations and then trying to take a hard, extended look at campus life both here at the University of Virginia and around the country eventually led me to some different conclusions.Beauty Extended Definition Essay Beauty is something that can be interpreted completely different from person to person.
|Art - Wikipedia||Bex June 10, at 8:|
|The Best Villanelles of All Time with a Definition, History, Timeline and Examples||One must note, however, that such… The nature and scope of aesthetics Aesthetics is broader in scope than the philosophy of art, which comprises one of its branches. It deals not only with the nature and value of the arts but also with those responses to natural objects that find expression in the language of the beautiful and the ugly.|
|Aesthetics | philosophy | skybox2008.com||Indeed, looking at his self portraits, we discover the handsome man he was, with his face reflecting the purity of his soul and his intelligence.|
|Sandra Effinger -- MsEffie's LifeSavers for Teachers||In the perspective of the history of art,  artistic works have existed for almost as long as humankind:|
A famous quote that goes along with this perfectly is . Literature: Literature, a body of written works. The name has traditionally been applied to those imaginative works of poetry and prose distinguished by the intentions of their authors and the perceived aesthetic excellence of their execution.
It may be classified according to a variety of systems, including language and genre. CONNOTATION: The extra tinge or taint of meaning each word carries beyond the minimal, strict definition found in a skybox2008.com instance, the terms civil war, revolution and rebellion have the same denotation; they all refer to an attempt at social or political change.
The HyperTexts The Best Villanelles of All Time Which poets wrote the best villanelles in the English language? But first ― thinking of Socrates ― how do we properly define the term "villanelle"?
As we are about to see ― through definitions, a brief history and some stellar examples ― the villanelle may be one of the most "misunderstood" of the English poetic forms. On the uses of a liberal education: 1.
as lite entertainment for bored college students. September 1, Harper's Magazine. Mark Edmundson. A college student getting a liberal arts education ponders filling out a questionnaire that includes an opportunity for him to evaluate his instructor.
Wikipedia’s definition of beauty is, “a characteristic of a person, animal, place, object, or idea that provides a perceptual experience of pleasure or satisfaction” while Oxford Dictionary states, “beauty is a combination of qualities, such as shape, color, or form, that .